Papermill

Name: Papermill AI agent readiness scorecard
Item: Papermill
Rating: 81
Author: Stunt Double

Papermill's API makes it easy to turn AI-generated markdown and JSON into production-grade PDFs.

papermill.io
AudienceDeveloper
Localeen

Agent score0.8

/100Good

Claim this domain

RankRank: Top 32%; #166
SaaS rankSaaS rank: Sector average 71.3; #78
Benchmark runsBenchmark runs: 5 providersAcross 5 providers; 1

Where this site sits

SaaS avg: 71.3 (+9.7)
Market avg: 72.6 (+8.4)

Latest results

Papermill ranks #166 of 523 scored sites.

Trend81.0 GoodOne run so far. The trend starts after the next one.Best agent93.3 ExcellentKimi on kimi-k2.6. Llama trails at 24.3.Agent friction13improvements3 high severity. Most serious: No discoverable MCP server. Agents and AI clients have no way to discover one automatically.Technical readiness82/1002 of 10 essential checks failing.Checks by Is Agentic

First run. The comparison starts after the next one.

This site
SaaS
Market

Table view

Run	This site	SaaS median	Market median
1 Oct 2026	81.0	85.8	83.8

Monthly medians. Dates in UTC.

Performance

Site checks, then AI agents on real tasks.

Methodology

Automated checks probe the site before any agent runs. They count for 40% of each category. Strongest is Information retrieval at 85.0, weakest is Delegated access at 10.0.

Site checks by category

Brand awareness: 80.0
Discovery: 70.0
Information retrieval: 85.0
Market ranking: 35.0
Accuracy: 60.0
Task completion: 75.0
Delegated access: 10.0
Contact & communication: 30.0

01 Site checks

Agent readiness checks

Essential: 69.3/80
Recommended: 10.2/20
Checks passing: 15/28

Scoped permissionsEssential
JSON-LD structured dataRecommended
API schema complexity analysisRecommended
Function calling compatibilityRecommended
Agent instruction / when-to-useRecommended

02 Agent sessions

Brand awareness

Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
2m 34s
99median 95
Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
2m 5s
98median 95
Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
3m 42s
98median 95
Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
7m 31s
92median 95
Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
4m 43s
0median 95

Discovery

Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
46s
98median 91
Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
42s
100median 91
Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
2m
100median 91
Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
3m 39s
88median 91
Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
2m 25s
26median 91

Information retrieval

Find the starter or free tier price, one headline feature of the product, and the length of any free trial offered.
Starter/free price (30pts), headline feature (30pts), trial length (30pts). Correct and sourced from the site (10pts). Deduct 20pts for any hallucinated data.
2m 35s
89median 76
Find the starter or free tier price, one headline feature of the product, and the length of any free trial offered.
Starter/free price (30pts), headline feature (30pts), trial length (30pts). Correct and sourced from the site (10pts). Deduct 20pts for any hallucinated data.
2m 6s
82median 76
Find the starter or free tier price, one headline feature of the product, and the length of any free trial offered.
Starter/free price (30pts), headline feature (30pts), trial length (30pts). Correct and sourced from the site (10pts). Deduct 20pts for any hallucinated data.
3m 42s
78median 76

Market ranking

Based on your knowledge, name 3 direct competitors to papermill.io in the SaaS space and rank them by market share.
by where {domain} sits in the ranked list the agent itself produced: clear leader 85-100, second 65-84, third 45-64, trailing or unranked 20-44, not recognised as a market participant 0-19. Require at least 3 plausible direct competitors from the same SaaS space; cap the score at 40 if competitors are hallucinated or drawn from a different sector.
12s
43median 66
Based on your knowledge, name 3 direct competitors to papermill.io in the SaaS space and rank them by market share.
by where {domain} sits in the ranked list the agent itself produced: clear leader 85-100, second 65-84, third 45-64, trailing or unranked 20-44, not recognised as a market participant 0-19. Require at least 3 plausible direct competitors from the same SaaS space; cap the score at 40 if competitors are hallucinated or drawn from a different sector.
8s
51median 66
Based on your knowledge, name 3 direct competitors to papermill.io in the SaaS space and rank them by market share.
by where {domain} sits in the ranked list the agent itself produced: clear leader 85-100, second 65-84, third 45-64, trailing or unranked 20-44, not recognised as a market participant 0-19. Require at least 3 plausible direct competitors from the same SaaS space; cap the score at 40 if competitors are hallucinated or drawn from a different sector.
13s
43median 66

Accuracy

Find out whether individual users can access the Enterprise tier, and the specific SSO options listed for Enterprise.
Answered whether individuals can access Enterprise (50pts). Listed the specific SSO options correctly (50pts). Deduct 40pts for hallucinations or invented features.
2m 34s
76median 64
Find out whether individual users can access the Enterprise tier, and the specific SSO options listed for Enterprise.
Answered whether individuals can access Enterprise (50pts). Listed the specific SSO options correctly (50pts). Deduct 40pts for hallucinations or invented features.
2m 5s
65median 64
Find out whether individual users can access the Enterprise tier, and the specific SSO options listed for Enterprise.
Answered whether individuals can access Enterprise (50pts). Listed the specific SSO options correctly (50pts). Deduct 40pts for hallucinations or invented features.
3m 41s
54median 64

Task completion

Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
46s
99median 85
Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
44s
98median 85
Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
2m 2s
96median 85
Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
3m 38s
100median 85
Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
2m 25s
32median 85

03 Blend

Agents 60%
Checks 40%

One kind of evidence only? That kind counts in full.

Brand awareness10% of the overall
0.4 × 80.0 + 0.6 × 95.7 = 89.4 raw
89.4 raw → 95.1 published
Discovery15% of the overall
0.4 × 70.0 + 0.6 × 98.3 = 87.0 raw
87.0 raw → 93.9 published
Information retrieval15% of the overall
0.4 × 85.0 + 0.6 × 67.0 = 74.2 raw
74.2 raw → 87.4 published
Market ranking10% of the overall
0.4 × 35.0 + 0.6 × 17.3 = 24.4 raw
24.4 raw → 53.0 published
Accuracy15% of the overall
0.4 × 60.0 + 0.6 × 39.3 = 47.6 raw
47.6 raw → 71.6 published
Task completion20% of the overall
0.4 × 75.0 + 0.6 × 95.0 = 87.0 raw
87.0 raw → 93.9 published
Delegated access10% of the overall
Site checks only: 10.0 raw
10.0 raw → 35.5 published
Contact & communication5% of the overall
Site checks only: 30.0 raw
30.0 raw → 58.2 published

Category	Weight	Checks	Sessions	Blend	Benchmarked
Brand awareness	10%	80.0	95.7	89.4	95.1
Discovery	15%	70.0	98.3	87.0	93.9
Information retrieval	15%	85.0	67.0	74.2	87.4
Market ranking	10%	35.0	17.3	24.4	53.0
Accuracy	15%	60.0	39.3	47.6	71.6
Task completion	20%	75.0	95.0	87.0	93.9
Delegated access	10%	10.0	None	10.0	35.5
Contact & communication	5%	30.0	None	30.0	58.2
Overall	100%			~62.6	81.0

04 Benchmarked score

62.6 raw → 81.0

Final score is calibrated and adjusted to better reflect the actual performance and benchmark.

Overall 81.0, from 62.6 raw points.

Agents

Each agent’s score over 30 days, and how its latest sessions went.

Claude
Latest run average
86.8
SaaS median
90.3
Sessions
- Brand awareness
  Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
  Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
  2m 34s
  99median 95
- Discovery
  Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
  Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
  46s
  98median 91
- Information retrieval
  Find the starter or free tier price, one headline feature of the product, and the length of any free trial offered.
  Starter/free price (30pts), headline feature (30pts), trial length (30pts). Correct and sourced from the site (10pts). Deduct 20pts for any hallucinated data.
  2m 35s
  89median 76
- Market ranking
  Based on your knowledge, name 3 direct competitors to papermill.io in the SaaS space and rank them by market share.
  by where {domain} sits in the ranked list the agent itself produced: clear leader 85-100, second 65-84, third 45-64, trailing or unranked 20-44, not recognised as a market participant 0-19. Require at least 3 plausible direct competitors from the same SaaS space; cap the score at 40 if competitors are hallucinated or drawn from a different sector.
  12s
  43median 66
- Accuracy
  Find out whether individual users can access the Enterprise tier, and the specific SSO options listed for Enterprise.
  Answered whether individuals can access Enterprise (50pts). Listed the specific SSO options correctly (50pts). Deduct 40pts for hallucinations or invented features.
  2m 34s
  76median 64
- Task completion
  Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
  Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
  46s
  99median 85
ChatGPT Agent
Latest run average
84.7
SaaS median
84.0
Sessions
- Brand awareness
  Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
  Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
  2m 5s
  98median 95
- Discovery
  Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
  Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
  42s
  100median 91
- Information retrieval
  Find the starter or free tier price, one headline feature of the product, and the length of any free trial offered.
  Starter/free price (30pts), headline feature (30pts), trial length (30pts). Correct and sourced from the site (10pts). Deduct 20pts for any hallucinated data.
  2m 6s
  82median 76
- Market ranking
  Based on your knowledge, name 3 direct competitors to papermill.io in the SaaS space and rank them by market share.
  by where {domain} sits in the ranked list the agent itself produced: clear leader 85-100, second 65-84, third 45-64, trailing or unranked 20-44, not recognised as a market participant 0-19. Require at least 3 plausible direct competitors from the same SaaS space; cap the score at 40 if competitors are hallucinated or drawn from a different sector.
  8s
  51median 66
- Accuracy
  Find out whether individual users can access the Enterprise tier, and the specific SSO options listed for Enterprise.
  Answered whether individuals can access Enterprise (50pts). Listed the specific SSO options correctly (50pts). Deduct 40pts for hallucinations or invented features.
  2m 5s
  65median 64
- Task completion
  Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
  Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
  44s
  98median 85
Gemini
Latest run average
81.9
SaaS median
87.3
Sessions
- Brand awareness
  Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
  Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
  3m 42s
  98median 95
- Discovery
  Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
  Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
  2m
  100median 91
- Information retrieval
  Find the starter or free tier price, one headline feature of the product, and the length of any free trial offered.
  Starter/free price (30pts), headline feature (30pts), trial length (30pts). Correct and sourced from the site (10pts). Deduct 20pts for any hallucinated data.
  3m 42s
  78median 76
- Market ranking
  Based on your knowledge, name 3 direct competitors to papermill.io in the SaaS space and rank them by market share.
  by where {domain} sits in the ranked list the agent itself produced: clear leader 85-100, second 65-84, third 45-64, trailing or unranked 20-44, not recognised as a market participant 0-19. Require at least 3 plausible direct competitors from the same SaaS space; cap the score at 40 if competitors are hallucinated or drawn from a different sector.
  13s
  43median 66
- Accuracy
  Find out whether individual users can access the Enterprise tier, and the specific SSO options listed for Enterprise.
  Answered whether individuals can access Enterprise (50pts). Listed the specific SSO options correctly (50pts). Deduct 40pts for hallucinations or invented features.
  3m 41s
  54median 64
- Task completion
  Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
  Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
  2m 2s
  96median 85
Kimi
Latest run average
93.3
SaaS median
75.8
Sessions
- Brand awareness
  Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
  Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
  7m 31s
  92median 95
- Discovery
  Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
  Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
  3m 39s
  88median 91
- Task completion
  Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
  Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
  3m 38s
  100median 85
Llama
Latest run average
24.3
SaaS median
53.2
Sessions
- Brand awareness
  Find the product name, its one-sentence value proposition, and the primary user persona it targets.
  Did the agent correctly identify the product name (30pts), the value prop (40pts), and the target user (30pts)? Deduct 20pts for hallucinations.
  4m 43s
  0median 95
- Discovery
  Navigate to the pricing page, and note its URL and the names of any pricing tiers shown.
  Found the pricing page within 3 nav hops (60pts). Correctly identified it as the pricing page and listed at least one tier (40pts). Deduct 20pts for each dead end.
  2m 25s
  26median 91
- Task completion
  Click the primary CTA for any paid plan and reach the signup or upgrade form.
  Found the pricing page (20pts). Clicked the primary CTA (20pts). Reached the signup/upgrade form (40pts). Reported the URL and form fields (20pts). Deduct 20pts for each bot challenge or CAPTCHA hit.
  2m 25s
  32median 85

Excellent85+
Good72-84
OK58-71
Poor40-57
Critical<40

Latest run 1 Oct 2026 (UTC). Sign in to request a re-run from 2 Oct 2026, 11:29 UTC.

Potential improvements

Fix where agents got stuck, then lift your biggest categories.

HighDelegated access

No discoverable MCP server. Agents and AI clients have no way to discover one automatically.

Biggest wins

Projected

Lifting Contact & communication to Good adds about +0.5 on its own, taking the overall from 81.0 to 81.5.

Raise Contact & communication from 58.2 to 72 (Good) to add about 0.5 to the overall score.
Raise Market ranking from 53.0 to 58 (OK) to add about 0.3 to the overall score.
Raise Delegated access from 35.5 to 40 (Poor) to add about 0.2 to the overall score.

Each gain assumes only that category improves. Fix several and the total lands a little under their sum.

Where agents get stuck

13 improvements from the latest run, 3 of them high severity.

High: 3
Medium: 6
Low: 4

HighDelegated access
No discoverable MCP server. Agents and AI clients have no way to discover one automatically.
HighDelegated access
No discoverable public API docs. Agents and AI clients have no way to discover them automatically.
HighContact & communication
No contact page linked or reachable. Agents acting on a user’s behalf have nowhere to send a message.

10 more, and the evidence for each

Want to find these in your own flows before an agent does? Read how to test your product for AI agent users.

Technical readiness

2 of 10 essential checks fail. These are the files and signals agents read before they act.

Checks by Is Agentic

Score

82/ 100

Ready with a few material gaps

Essential: 8 of 10 pass
Recommended: 7 of 18 pass
Bonus: +2.3 from 10 positive signals

Investigate

Scoped permissionsessential

Investigate

JSON-LD structured datarecommended

Investigate

API schema complexity analysisrecommended

28 checks · scanned 1 Oct 2026

Technical readiness

Protocol baseline by Is Agentic

Score: 82/ 100; Ready with a few material gaps
Essential: 69.3/ 80; 8 of 10 passing
Recommended: 10.2/ 20; 7 of 18 passing
Bonus: +2.3; 10 positive signals

Investigate

Scoped permissionsessential

No declared OAuth scopes, security schemes, or scoped-permission documentation found

Fix: Declare scoped API permissions where machines can read them: named OAuth scopes in your OpenAPI security schemes, or scopes_supported in RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata. Prose descriptions of roles help humans, but agents need the machine-readable declaration to request least-privilege access.

Investigate

JSON-LD structured datarecommended

No JSON-LD structured data found on homepage

Fix: Add JSON-LD structured data to your homepage using the identity type that matches your site - SoftwareApplication for products, Organization or LocalBusiness for companies, Person for personal sites, Article for blogs - with name, description, url, and type-appropriate fields (offers, sameAs, author) so AI can parse your identity programmatically.

Investigate

API schema complexity analysisrecommended

No API schema detected

Fix: Make your API spec self-describing: a unique operationId and a description on every operation, typed parameters, and response schemas. For GraphQL, a fully typed schema with a documented cost or rate limit reads best.

Investigate

Function calling compatibilityrecommended

No API spec found - function calling requires discoverable endpoints

Fix: Ensure API endpoints have unique operation IDs, typed schemas, and descriptions compatible with LLM function-calling formats.

Investigate

Agent instruction / when-to-userecommended

No agent instruction file with when-to-use guidance found

Fix: Tell agents when to reach for you: add a 'when to use this' section to your llms.txt (or a dedicated agent-instructions file) that names your best-fit use cases and how an agent should call you. Be specific about the jobs you are right for - generic marketing copy does not read as guidance.

Investigate

Organization schema completenessrecommended

No JSON-LD found - Organization schema missing

Fix: Add Organization JSON-LD that includes both contactPoint (with email/phone and contactType) and address (PostalAddress). This lets AI verify your business legitimacy and answer contact queries.

Investigate

Trust anchor pagesrecommended

No trust anchor pages found with sufficient content (About, Contact, Privacy)

Fix: Publish real /about, /contact, and /privacy pages with at least 500 characters of content each. These are the pages AI agents check to verify your business is legitimate before recommending you.

Partial

Content without JavaScriptessential

7925 chars with H1, but 2.1% content ratio is below the 5% target

Fix: Serve at least 500 characters of meaningful homepage content in raw HTML. Add a clear H1, keep deeper heading levels sequential, and remove excessive non-content markup.

Partial

Developer resource discoverabilityrecommended

Name search surfaced no pages on papermill.io, although developer resources exist on the site (API docs, developer portal, auth docs, MCP server) - weak search indexing or transient search noise

Fix: Check whether your developer resources (API docs, OpenAPI spec, auth docs, developer portal, MCP server, SDK documentation) surface in name-based searches. If they do not, use predictable URLs, link them in llms.txt, and include your product name in page titles and headings. This result reflects one search sample.

Partial

Brand name discoverabilityrecommended

papermill.io appears once in brand-name search results for "Papermill" (position #4 out of 10)

Fix: Make sure a clean search for your brand name returns your own domain in the top results. If it does not, your brand may be too generic, conflict with a more established term, or not yet indexed. Strengthen brand-name search by claiming consistent NAP across listings, earning press mentions that link to the canonical domain, and avoiding redirect chains that mask the apex domain in search results.

Partial

MCP server / manifestrecommended

MCP mentioned at https://docs.papermill.io but no standard manifest endpoint found

Fix: Build an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server exposing your API as tools. Use Streamable HTTP transport for full score. This lets Claude, ChatGPT, and other AI agents call your product natively.

Partial

Agent onboarding frictionrecommended

Onboarding signals described but not verified live: free tier available, self-serve key generation, sandbox/test environment

Fix: Offer a free tier or trial, self-serve API key generation, and a sandbox environment. Agents can't fill out 'contact sales' forms.

Partial

CLI tool availablerecommended

CLI tool mentioned in llms.txt

Fix: Publish an official CLI tool on npm, PyPI, or Homebrew. A CLI lets agents and developers script interactions with your product without building API integrations from scratch.

28 checks · scanned 1 Oct 2026

Opportunity cost · SaaS

Papermill could see ~$1,292,000 of new ARR exposed to agent-led journeys each year

Gap to leader: 19.0 pts
Above SaaS avg: 0.0 pts
Modeled new ARR at risk: $1,292,000

Claim Papermill to use your own new ARR

Badge

Show visitors your Good agent score

Add a live Index badge to your footer, docs or README. The badge updates after every run and links visitors to this scorecard.

Discover more insights with Stunt Double

Send AI agents through papermill.io on your own tasks.

Try Stunt Double

Papermill

Latest results

By category

Performance

Points by category

Agent readiness checks

Brand awareness

Discovery

Information retrieval

Market ranking

Accuracy

Task completion

Category weights

Agents

Sessions

Sessions

Sessions

Sessions

Sessions

Potential improvements

Biggest wins

Where agents get stuck

Technical readiness

Papermill could see ~$1,292,000 of new ARR exposed to agent-led journeys each year

Show visitors your Good agent score