How we score a site
- Agents trying real tasks
- 60%
- Quick checks
- 40%
01
The short version
We check the basics
Before any agent visits, we make a handful of quick requests to your site. Can an agent reach it? Does it say what agents may do? Does it publish the files agents look for? Does the search agents use turn it up?
Agents try real tasks
Claude, ChatGPT Agent, Gemini, Kimi, Llama and Grok open your site in a real browser and try what a customer would: find a product, read the refund policy, get to checkout.
We combine the two
Both results feed one score. What the agents managed counts for more, because that is what your customers get.
We calibrate against the benchmark
The combined score is calibrated and adjusted to better reflect how the site actually performs against every other site we score, so the published number reads the same way in every sector.
02
What the quick checks look for
They run every time a site is scored, and each one keeps its evidence, so a scorecard shows what passed, what failed and why.
Can agents get in?
We read what your robots.txt allows each agent, request your homepage as ourselves, and look for bot challenges that stop an agent at the door.
robots.txt rules per providerchallenge headersDo agents find you when they search?
Most agents search before they visit. We ask the search index agents use for your name and for what you do, and check that it holds readable pages from your site.
Exa or Tavily searchyour namewhat you doindexed pagesCan they find their way around?
We follow the paths a customer would take: pricing, signup, cart and contact, plus your sitemap.
sitemap.xmlkey task pagesDo you tell agents what you offer?
We look for the files written for agents, and whether your pages can be read as plain text rather than a wall of markup.
llms.txtmarkdown negotiationstructured dataCan an agent connect and sign in?
We check whether you publish the details an agent needs to use your service on someone’s behalf.
MCP server cardOAuth and OIDC discoveryA2A agent cardCan an agent buy from you?
For shops, we check whether you advertise a way for agents to check out.
Universal Commerce Protocol discovery
03
What the agents do
Each sector has its own set of tasks, chosen from what people there ask agents to do.
Each provider runs four tasks on your site: research who you are, your prices and policies; go from your homepage through to signing up or checking out; find how an agent could act for a customer; and find how to reach you. We also ask each model, with no browser, how you compare to competitors, to test what it already knows.
The agent uses a real browser and the same tools on every provider, clicking, typing and scrolling for itself. Every step is recorded, and a separate grader marks each session against a fixed rubric, so no agent marks its own work. Each category averages the providers below.
The top 50 sites get a monthly run of the research, the journey and the competitor question, which cover most of the score. Other sites get the quick checks. A category with no new session keeps its last result. Verified owners can rescan every task and watch the replays.
- Claudeclaude-opus-5-5
- ChatGPT Agentgpt-6-luna
- Geminigemini-3.8-flash
- Kimikimi-k2.6hosted onCloudflare
- Llamallama-4-scout-17b-16e-instructhosted onCloudflare
- Grokgrok-4.7hosted onCloudflare
04
What the score is made of
Eight questions, each scored on its own and weighted by how much it matters.
- 10%
Can agents recognize you exist?
Brand awareness
- 15%
Will they pick you?
Discovery
- 15%
Can they read your site?
Information retrieval
- 10%
Where do you sit in the lineup?
Market ranking
- 15%
Do they tell the truth about you?
Accuracy
- 20%
Can an agent complete a task on behalf of a user?
Task completion
- 10%
Do you let agents in, safely?
Delegated access
- 5%
Can an agent reach a human?
Contact & communication
The overall score is the average of the eight, weighted as shown. That raw score is then calibrated against the benchmark: every published score, overall and per category, is adjusted to better reflect actual performance across the sites we score. Calibration never changes the order of sites, only how far apart they read.
Some sites turn our quick checks away (a 401, 403 or 429 on the homepage) or do not answer at all. Unless an agent session got through, we mark those sites not scored: a number would measure our requests, not the site. They keep a scorecard page but stay out of rankings, averages and charts until a check or an agent reaches them.
05
Value at risk
Unclaimed scorecards for sites that sell something show an estimate of the revenue a low score could cost. Free sites (public services, non-profits, open-source projects) don’t get one, because there is no revenue to lose. To tell them apart, Jev, a decision model by TypeSafe AI, reads the site’s own name and description and decides whether it sells anything. When it isn’t confident, a general model makes the call, and a site we can’t place gets no estimate.
It is an estimate, not a measurement. We take the share of sector traffic expected to come through agents by 2027 (drawn from Gartner’s agentic AI forecasts and Adobe Analytics’ data on AI-referred retail traffic), apply it to an illustrative revenue figure for the sector, and scale it by how far the site is from a perfect score. Sources are cited wherever the figure appears.
Owners who claim their domain can swap in their own numbers or hide the estimate.
How our agents behave on your site
If our agent got stuck on your site, an agent working for a real customer would too.
They say who they are
Every request and every agent carries
StuntDoubleIndexin its user agent, so you can see us in your logs and name us in robots.txt.They respect your opt-out
If robots.txt or your headers say no, we stay out.
They never pay or sign up for real
No payments go through and no real registration details are ever entered.
We keep no personal information
Sessions record what the agent saw and did, not who you are.
We visit gently
We cap how often we request pages from each site.
Scoring methodology
v2026.10
Since October 1, 2026
When we improve how we score, or agents gain new or updated technology, we release a new version of the methodology. Every score is stamped with the version it was calculated with, so results stay accurate, comparable and open to scrutiny.