Skip to main content

Jurnii

Jurnii automates UX benchmarking and competitor proposition tracking for iGaming operators. Replace manual research with near-real-time intelligence.

Agent scoredown 2.6
69.4/100OK
Rank
Top 68%
#359
SaaS rank
Sector average 71.3
#130
Benchmark runs
4 providers
1
Where this site sits
SaaS avg
71.3 (−1.9)
Market avg
72.6 (−3.2)

01

Latest results

Jurnii ranks #359 of 525 scored sites.

First run. The comparison starts after the next one.

Overall: 69.4 now
Brand awareness: 91.9 now
Discovery: 62.2 now
Information retrieval: 83.3 now
Market ranking: 34.5 now
Accuracy: 79.2 now
Task completion: 59.5 now
Delegated access: 53.6 now
Contact & communication: 69.8 now
  • This site
  • SaaS
  • Market

By category

  • Brand awareness
    92
  • Discovery
    62
  • Information retrieval
    83
  • Market ranking
    35
  • Accuracy
    79
  • Task completion
    60
  • Delegated access
    54
  • Contact & communication
    70
Table view
RunThis siteSaaS medianMarket median
2 Oct 202669.485.182.4

Monthly medians. Dates in UTC.

02

Performance

Site checks, then AI agents on real tasks.

Methodology

Automated checks probe the site before any agent runs. They count for 40% of each category. Strongest is Brand awareness at 72.0, weakest is Market ranking at 10.0.

Site checks by category

Brand awareness
72.0
Discovery
72.0
Information retrieval
48.0
Market ranking
10.0
Accuracy
55.0
Task completion
45.0
Delegated access
25.0
Contact & communication
45.0

Agents

Each agent’s score over 30 days, and how its latest sessions went.

  • Excellent85+
  • Good72-84
  • OK58-71
  • Poor40-57
  • Critical<40

Latest run 2 Oct 2026 (UTC). Sign in to request a re-run from 3 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC.

03

Potential improvements

Fix where agents got stuck, then lift your biggest categories.

HighInformation retrieval

Homepage ships little text to server-rendered HTML. Agents without a browser see an empty shell.

Biggest wins

Projected

Lifting Task completion to Good adds about +2.3 on its own, taking the overall from 69.4 to 71.7.

  1. Raise Task completion from 59.5 to 72 (Good) to add about 2.3 to the overall score.

  2. Raise Discovery from 62.2 to 72 (Good) to add about 1.4 to the overall score.

  3. Raise Accuracy from 79.2 to 85 (Excellent) to add about 1.1 to the overall score.

Each gain assumes only that category improves. Fix several and the total lands a little under their sum.

Where agents get stuck

17 improvements from the latest run, 2 of them high severity.

High
2
Medium
9
Low
6
  1. HighInformation retrieval

    Homepage ships little text to server-rendered HTML. Agents without a browser see an empty shell.

  2. HighDelegated access

    No discoverable MCP server. Agents and AI clients have no way to discover one automatically.

  3. MediumBrand awareness

    No Organization JSON-LD. Agents can’t tell who owns the site at a glance.

14 more, and the evidence for each

Want to find these in your own flows before an agent does? Read how to test your product for AI agent users.

Technical readiness

Robots, sitemaps, llms.txt, structured data and more, checked by Is Agentic.

Protocol baseline by Is Agentic

No Is Agentic report for jurnii.io yet

Opportunity cost · SaaS

Jurnii could see ~$2,080,800 of new ARR exposed to agent-led journeys each year

Gap to leader
30.6 pts
Below SaaS avg
3.2 pts
Modeled new ARR at risk
$2,080,800

Badge

Show visitors you take AI agents seriously

Add a live Index badge to your footer, docs or README. The badge updates after every run and links visitors to this scorecard.

jurnii.io Stunt Double Index agent score badge

Discover more insights with Stunt Double

Send AI agents through jurnii.io on your own tasks.

Try Stunt Double