/ Index
Sign in
Leaderboard›ecommerce

Steam Community

steamcommunity.com
Claim this domain
Overall score
60.8OK
—
Rank
#280
Prev: #0
ecommerce avg
61.6
118 peers
Agent runs / week
1
Across 1 providers

Community Hubs are collections of all the best community and official game content as rated by users.

Locales
en
Opportunity cost · e-commerce

Steam Community could be leaving ~$6,664,000 in revenue on the table every year

Stunt Double’s 2027 agent-traffic model projects 34% of product discovery and checkout sessions in the e-commerce sector will be initiated or completed by AI agents[1][2]. Steam Community currently scores 60.8 on the Stunt Double Index[3], with a 39-point gap to the ideal agent experience (100). The loss figure below applies that gap to the projected agent-driven slice of a typical annual e-commerce revenuebaseline for this sector — it is a directional estimate, not a measured conversion rate.

Gap to leader
39.2 pts
Above e-commerce avg
0.0 pts
Modelled revenue at risk
$6,664,000

Estimate assumes a $50M annual e-commerce revenue baseline. Claim your domain to replace this placeholder with your reported revenue.

Sources
  1. [1]Gartner (2025) — Intelligent Agents in AI Really Can Work Alone. Here’s How.
  2. [2]Adobe Analytics (2025) — Generative AI traffic to U.S. retail sites (weekly trend)
  3. [3]Stunt Double (2026) — Stunt Double Index methodology & scoring rubric

Category breakdown

Brand awarenessCan agents recognise you exist?
65
DiscoveryWill they pick you?
70
Information retrievalCan they read your site?
65
Market rankingWhere do you sit in the lineup?
25
AccuracyDo they tell the truth about you?
65
Task completionCan an agent complete a task on behalf of a user?
55
Delegated accessDo you let agents in, safely?
100
Contact & communicationCan an agent reach a human?
45

By agent provider

By agent provider
Session quality, 30-day rolling, N ≥ 10 per provider
Claude
Anthropic
0.0
ChatGPT Agent
OpenAI
100.0
Gemini
Google
0.0
Perplexity
Perplexity
Copilot
Microsoft
Browserbase Operator
Browserbase

Where agents get stuck

Public summary · full session replay available to verified owners
mediumBrand awareness
No Organization JSON-LD. Agents can’t tell who owns the site at a glance.
lowBrand awareness
Fewer than two social profiles linked. Agents struggle to triangulate the brand.
lowDiscovery
No canonical URL. Agents may conflate duplicate pages as separate entities.
mediumInformation retrieval
No JSON-LD structured data. Agents must infer entities from markup.
mediumMarket ranking
No Product/Service schema on the homepage. Agents can’t easily compare offerings.
lowMarket ranking
No review or aggregateRating schema. Agents have no signal for ranking vs peers.
mediumMarket ranking
No price visible to non-JS clients. Agents may report "pricing not disclosed".
lowAccuracy
No canonical URL. Agents may cite ephemeral query-string variants.
mediumAccuracy
No JSON-LD at all. Every factual claim must be inferred from prose.
mediumTask completion
No visible primary call-to-action in the server-rendered HTML. Agents have nothing concrete to click on behalf of a user.
mediumTask completion
No mention of delegated auth primitives (passkey, OAuth, MCP). Agents must drive a full browser session.
lowDelegated access
robots.txt doesn’t mention any agent user-agents. The policy for agents is implicit.
mediumContact & communication
No contact email visible in server-rendered HTML. Agents can’t fall back to email.